Saturday, June 25, 2022
No menu items!
HomeHealth ScienceCircRFWD3 promotes HNSCC metastasis by modulating miR-27a/b/PPARγ signaling

CircRFWD3 promotes HNSCC metastasis by modulating miR-27a/b/PPARγ signaling


Sufferers and follow-up

A complete of 9 pairs of tumors and adjoining nontumor tissues and 30 circumstances of metastatic and nonmetastatic samples have been collected from pathologically identified sufferers with HNSCC (Appendix Desk S1). Noteworthily, a cohort of 214 HNSCC pathological samples and associated medical data was obtained (Tables 1, 2). Information on the opposite cohort comprising 499 sufferers with HNSCC, have been obtained from The Most cancers Genome Atlas (TCGA), EGA, and GEO database. The examine was authorised by the ethics committees of the West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan College, and was carried out in settlement with the Helsinki Declaration. Written knowledgeable consent was supplied by all members at baseline and through follow-up.

CircRNA microarray evaluation

9 tumor tissues have been divided into teams of three and paired adjoining nontumor tissues have been additionally divided into corresponding teams of three. Then, a complete of six teams of tissues have been deployed for circRNA microarray (Arraystar Inc.) and analyzed utilizing Arraystar Human circRNA Array V2. Uncooked sequencing information of circRNAs have been uploaded to GEO(GSE200946). General, the assay indicated a complete of 3157 circRNAs, Amongst them, 59 circRNAs have been stably upregulated and 76 circRNAs have been stably downregulated within the three teams as compared with nontumor tissues. Then, we screened the candidates in accordance with the next methods: 200 bp ≤ the size of the bottom ≤ 1500; fold change ≥2 and P < 0.05. After validation in circBase, 32 circRNAs have been obtained (Appendix Desk S2).

Cell cultures

Detailed data on HOK, UM1, UM2, HSC-3, CAL27, HN12, HN31, HN30, H413, and HEK293T cells is proven in Appendix Desk S3. HOK cells have been cultured in an outlined keratinocyte SFM medium (10744019, Thermo Fisher Scientific). UM1, UM2, HSC-3, CAL27, HN12, HN31, H413, and HEK293T cells have been appropriately cultured in DMEM (SH30243.01, HyClone) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptavidin answer. All cells have been usually examined for mycoplasma with a MycAwayTM Plus-Shade One-Step Mycoplasma Detection Equipment (40612ES25, Yeasen). Cells have been stored in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

Oligonucleotide transfection

Six-well plates have been used to tradition UM1 and HN31 cells, and transduction was carried out when cells have been 70–80% confluent. Serum-free medium was used earlier than transduction reagents have been added to the corresponding plates. Cells have been transfected utilizing Lipofectamine 2000 (11668019, Invitrogen Lipofectamine 2000) following the product’s handbook, and cells have been seeded after being cultured for 48–72 h. All siRNAs focusing on circRFWD3 and miRNA mimics or inhibitors have been synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China).


An expression assemble encoding shRNA of circRFWD3 was cloned into GV341plasmad to provide GV341-sh-circRFWD3 recombinant lentivirus (sh-circRFWD3) constructs, and empty GV341 lentivirus (sh-NC) was used as a management. The pmiR-27a/b-Luc plasmid was constructed by amplification of the upstream 2000 bp to downstream 100 bp sequence of miR-27a/b and subcloning into the pGL3-Fundamental plasmid. The wild-type or point-mutated 3′UTR of PPARγ reporter constructs (WT UTR or Mut UTR) have been designed by including a sequence of wild-type or point-mutated 3′UTR of PPARγ to the pGL3-Fundamental plasmid.

Steady cell line technology

GV341-sh-circRFWD3 recombinant lentiviruses (sh-circRFWD3 and sh-NC) have been bought from NeuronBiotech (Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd.). UM1 and HN31 cells have been contaminated with sh-circRFWD3 and sh-NC. Selective tradition medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin was used to pick the cells with steady expression of low circRFWD3 or vector controls. The expression of circRFWD3 was detected by RT-qPCR.

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

Complete RNA was remoted utilizing RNA Pure kits (TR-205-50, ZYMO RESEARCH) in accordance with the producer’s pointers from both cultured cells or liquid nitrogen–frozen tissues. The focus and purity of every RNA extract have been checked at a 260/280 ratio on a NanoDrop Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Onec). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was achieved through the use of the PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Equipment (RR037A, TaKaRa) in accordance with the producer’s pointers. Quantitative PCR was carried out with SYBR™ Choose Grasp Combine (4472908, Utilized Biosystems) following the product’s directions. Primer sequences have been listed in Appendix Desk S4. Three technical replicates have been set for each single response to make sure reliability and validity. The ΔΔCT worth of the goal gene expression was measured and assessed towards the worth of the reference genes GAPDH and U6.

RNase R digestion therapy and Sanger sequencing

RNase R digestion therapy was carried out by incubating 4 μg of complete RNA combination at 37 °C for 10 min with or with out 3 U/μg of RNase R, as instructed by the product’s handbook (RNR 07250, Epicenter). Following the removing of linear kinds, qRT-PCR qualification was carried out to substantiate the round construction of circRFWD3. Sanger sequencing protecting the back-splicing junction sequence was carried out utilizing the qRT-PCR product of circRFWD3 by TSINGKE firm. A complete of two% agarose gel was used for DNA electrophoresis. The sequences of divergent primers and convergent primers are proven in Appendix Desk S4.

Actinomycin D assay

UM1 and HN31 cells have been uncovered to a whole medium (DMEM with 1 μg/mL actinomycin D (A1410, Sigma-Aldrich) to dam transcription for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h. The cells have been harvested, and the expression of circRFWD3 and RFWD3 mRNA was analyzed utilizing qRT-PCR.

Cell invasion assay

UM1 and HN31 cells at a focus of 1 × 105 cells in 200 μl of serum-free medium have been inoculated within the higher chamber and coated with progress factor-reduced Matrigel® (356234, Corning), and a medium containing 15% FBS was added to the decrease chamber as a chemoattractant. After incubation for twenty-four h (UM1)/30 h (HN31), cells on the higher floor of the membrane and cells have been eliminated by wiping with a Q-tip, and the invaded or migrated cells have been mounted with formaldehyde and stained utilizing 0.5% crystal violet. The numbers of migrated and invaded cells have been counted in 5 randomly chosen fields beneath a microscope. The experiment was replicated thrice.

Cell migration assay

The assay was much like the in vitro invasion assay, besides that no progress factor-reduced Matrigel® (356,234, Corning) was added to the chamber. After incubation for 18 h (UM1) or 24 h (HN31), cells on the higher floor of cells have been eliminated by wiping with a Q-tip, and the invaded or migrated cells have been mounted with formaldehyde and stained utilizing 0.5% crystal violet. Cells in 5 randomized fields of view at 400× have been counted and represented as the common variety of cells per subject of view. The experiment was additionally replicated thrice.


RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out utilizing the Fluorescent in situ Hybridization Equipment (lnc1CM001, RiboBio) in accordance with the producer’s directions. Cy3-labeled probes focusing on circRFWD3, 5FAM-labeled miR-27a/27b, and Cy3-labeled probes focusing on PPARγ have been synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). Fluorescence was recorded with a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV3000, OLYMPUS).

RNA pull-down assay

RNA pull-down assays have been carried out in accordance with the Pierce™ Magnetic RNA-Protein Pull-Down Equipment (20164, Thermo Scientific). Biotinylated circRFWD3, miR-27a, and miR-27b probes have been synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). Pull-down RNA launched from the beads after cleaning was evaluated by qRT-PCR.

RNA immunoprecipitation

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments have been carried out with a RIP-Assay Equipment (RN1001, BML) in accordance with the producer’s pointers. Briefly, UM1 cells have been collected and resuspended in 200 μL RIP lysis buffer. A complete of 100 μL of every cell lysate was incubated with Protein G Agarose Beads (37478 S, Cell Signaling Know-how) conjugated with 15 µl argonaute 2 (Anti-EIF2C2 (AGO2) (Human) mAb, RN003 M, BML) or management rabbit IgG protein with light agitation at 4 °C in a single day. Immunoprecipitated RNA was then purified and measured by qRT-PCR for enrichment.

Western blot evaluation

For Western blot evaluation, cells have been washed thrice with 1x PBS after which used for extraction of complete proteins. Protein extracts have been ready by mammalian lysis buffer. Protein concentrations have been measured by the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Equipment (23250, Thermo Scientific). Protein extracts have been separated by 10% SDS PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, IPVH00010). Then, the PVDF membranes have been blotted individually with applicable main antibodies towards GAPDH (2148 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:3000), PPARγ (2435 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:1000), p65 (8242 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:1000), p-p65 (3033 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:1000), Rel B (ab33917, Abcam, dilution price 1:1000), MMP13 (ab51072, Abcam, dilution price 1:1000), MMP2 (40994 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:1000), MMP7 (3801 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:1000), and applicable secondary antibodies (mouse, ZB-2305; rabbit, ZB2301, ZSGB-BIO, dilution price 1:3000). Protein bands have been visualized utilizing a chemiluminescence system (Amersham Imager 600).

Luciferase reporter assay

Wild-type and predicted binding site-specific mutated miR-27a, miR-27b, and PPARγ 3′ UTR sequences have been synthesized and built-in into psiCHECK 2.0 vectors and cotransfected into HEK293T cells with miR-27a or miR-27b mimics utilizing Lipofectamine 2000 (11668019, Invitrogen Lipofectamine 2000). HEK293T cells have been lysed, and luciferase depth was measured 24 h after transfection. The ratio of Renilla luciferase to firefly luciferase absorbance was calculated to quantitatively analyze the interplay between miR-27a and miR-27b and PPARγ utilizing the luciferase reporter assay protocol advisable by Promega (E1910, Promega, USA).

In situ hybridization (ISH)


Immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PPARγ (#2435 S, Cell Signaling Know-how, dilution price 1:100) was carried out in FFPE specimens after antigen retrieval with citrate buffer (0.01 M, pH 6.0), after which it was visualized by diaminobenzidine (GK600510, DAKO 1:50 dilution). For PPARγ, the depth of staining (0, no staining; 1, weakly stained; 2, reasonably stained; 3, strongly stained) was assessed by two skilled pathologists with none data of the medical and pathological information, and the proportion of constructive cells was famous. For the statistics of prognostic worth within the HNSCC cohort, the overall staining scale was divided into two classes: low expression (the staining depth was 0 and 1) and excessive expression (the staining depth was 2 and three).

mRNA expression evaluation

World human mRNA expression was analyzed by RNA sequencing (Novogene) following the producer’s normal protocol. Briefly, after therapy with 20 μM GW9662, UM1 and HN31 cells have been lysed with TRIzol reagent (15596026, Thermo Fisher), and complete RNA was extracted in accordance with the usual methodology. Genes with |fold change | ≥2 and P < 0.05) have been thought-about differentially expressed. Subsequent, RNA sequencing was carried out, and goal genes have been analyzed.

Animal experiments

Forty-eight feminine BALB/c nude mice (SPF degree) aged 5–6 weeks have been bought from Charles River Firm (Beijing, China), which have been raised and manipulated within the Animal Central Laboratory of West China Second Hospital in compliance with the institutional pointers for animal use and care. Mice have been randomly divided into 4 teams: UM1 sh-circRFWD3, UM1 sh-NC, HN31 sh-circRFWD3, and HN31 sh-NC. Every group incorporates 12 mice (n = 12). Particularly, sh-circRFWD or sh-NC-infected UM1 and HN31 cells (Appendix Fig. 1C–F) have been intravenously injected into the tail vein of mice to assemble the lung metastasis mouse mannequin. Caudal vein injection was carried out with 100 μL stroke-physiological saline answer suspension of 106 cells utilizing a 1 mL insulin syringe. After injection, two mice died in 24 h due to cardiac failure and have been excluded. Animal weight was monitored weekly following injection. Euthanasia was initiated by CO2 suffocation and completed by cervical dislocation. The time level for sacrifice was based mostly on a mix of two standards: lack of >15% of pre-injection physique weight and/or when the mice confirmed indicators of ache and misery. Following sacrifice, the lung tumor nodules have been counted. The ultimate pattern numbers collected have been UM1 sh-NC group (n = 11), UM1 sh-cirCRFWD3 group (n = 11), HN31 sh-NC group (n = 12), and HN31 sh-circRFWD3 group (n = 12). Then, hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and IHC with anti-mitochondrial antibodies (ab92824, Abcam) have been used to find out the pulmonary metastasis of nude mice in every group.

H&E staining

Tissues have been immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for twenty-four h and washed in a single day with working water. The tissue was then positioned in an automated dehydrator. After dehydration, the tissues have been embedded in paraffin and sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. Dewaxing and gradient alcohol hydration have been carried out earlier than the sections have been counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin. After dehydration with an alcohol gradient, the sections have been sealed with impartial gum.

Statistical evaluation

All statistical analyses have been carried out utilizing GraphPad Prism model 8.0. Means ± SD have been introduced in quantification bar graphs. The χ2 check was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the affiliation of the expression of circRFWD3 and PPARγ with the affected person’s clinicopathologic parameters. Comparisons between teams for statistical significance have been carried out with the independent-sample t-test. Correlations have been analyzed by the Pearson correlation check. Survival evaluation was carried out by Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank check for significance. P values of <0.05 have been thought-about statistically important. The info have been the imply ± SD of three experiments. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments